Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Have paid Rs 75,000 cr to govt in 5 years: Voda India CEO

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 31 Maret 2015 | 21.03

Vodafone India CEO Marten Pieters – the longest serving chief executive of any telecom company in India -- will leave office after a 5-year stint at the company.

Discussing his time in India, the recently-concluded spectrum auctions and hurdles faced by telecom companies, Pieters said the country has been a difficult place to do business.

In an exclusive interview to CNBC-TV18's Shereen Bhan, Pieters said the company has paid Rs 75,000 crore to the government and zero to shareholders in the last 5 years. On spectrum auction, he said the company scrambled to make partial payment to government for spectrum.

According to Pieters, India has less than 40 percent spectrum available than other nations. He said Vodafone and telecom companies will survive, but India will lag behind in quality as "telcos have little capital available for network expansion."

Below is the transcript of Marten Pieters interview with CNBC-TV18's Shereen Bhan 

Q: Let me ask you about whether you decided to in National Interest make the upfront payment to the government on March 31, to help them reach the fiscal deficit target?

A: We scrambled and found some money in the coffers and made a partial payment.

Q: You are not going to tell me how much you have decided to pay. 

A: No, I am not going to tell you.

Q: Is it sizeable, will it reach the fiscal deficit?

A: We could have a very nice holiday of that amount.

Q: Let us talk about that journey here at Vodafone and I was just looking at the numbers. You came to India when you were 56, Vodafone was the fourth largest player, you have now taken it to become the second largest telecom company after Bharti Airtel . In six years you have doubled the size of the business to Rs 40,000 crore, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margins of about 30 percent. Vodafone India has the largest voice and data traffic within the Vodafone grid. This sounds like a dream story. It sounds like a walk in the park yet you have always maintained that India is perhaps the hardest place to do business in. 

A: I can only talk about telecom, so I was only speaking from a telecom's perspective and I can tell you that the telecoms market in India is challenging for various reasons. One is that there is a strict regulation, second is that the industry structure is so that many players many more than in most other countries in the world and there is also very little spectrum available and all together makes it really tough to be a profitable telecom operator in India. 

Q: But what you have been able to generate the kind of numbers I just talked about, yet you have been able to become the fastest growing upcore in the Vodafone group of companies. Yet you are I believe the most efficient upcore within the Vodafone group of upcores. One would say that if it is so tough to do business in India, how do you explain these numbers? 

A: I can give you another statistic. We paid Rs 75,000 crore to the government in the last five years. Since Vodafone has come to India which is 8 years ago, we paid zero to our shareholders. So, we might be very efficient, we might be very big, but we do not give returns to our shareholders. So, how long can you as a company only work actually de facto for the government? That is the bigger question here. 

Q: Given what they had to say in terms of the spectrum auction payout or what we are going to see in terms of the spectrum auction payout of the next 20 years, do you really see any significant expansion as far as the network is concerned? Significant investment in network expansion?

A: It will only happen if we as an industry will be able to raise tariffs. And that will only happen if we see some consolidation because the reality in the market is that tariffs are not related to spectrum auctions. Always when we have the spectrum auctions, after that newspapers are full of stories about tariffs are going to raise, tariffs need to raise. And of course from a financial perspective, we would love to raise tariffs because we need to be profitable in the end to make all these investments in the networks. But the reality is there are nine players out there. It is very competitive market and there are players who have not spent money in the auctions, there are players who have no reason to increase their tariffs, so we can only really see a more sustainable situation if the market fairly consolidates.

Q: I will come to consolidation in just a bit. Since you talked about the issue of tariff, we just had Idea on the channel talk about how they will be forced to do a significant hike in tariffs. What about Vodafone? Do you believe, minus what has happened as far as the spectrum auction is concerned because you said that that is not a direct correlation in terms of what happens to tariffs, do you feel the need for significant or even a minor hike in tariffs at this point in time? And do you have the capacity to be able to pass it off. 

A: We have seen 20 years of telecom. I have said this before, this was kind of the close in the first chapter in the book of mobile telecoms in India. The first chapter was 20 years. Only the last seven years in the 20 years, the industry has really grown fast. Before that it was growing but it actually grew very slow. The first five years of mobile telecoms in India only created one million customers. So, the 950 million sims that are now in the market is something really of the last 5-7 years. What we need to see is pricing that is following in the end at least inflation. If you take the 20 years, only one year in the 20 years we have as an industry been able to increase prices. Now I can tell you that cannot happen in the next 20 years. We will have to be able to increase our prices because this is still an inflationary country. It may no longer be so high as it was a few years ago but it is still at a 6-6 and a half percent. So, even if we would keep our nominal prices equal, the same it would mean that every year the price actually goes down by six and a half percent.

Q: Every year? You are saying the tariff increases by 6 and a half percent. 

A: No, I am just saying that if we do nothing like we have done in the last 20 years, de facto means that our income goes down by 6 and a half percent. What we need to do is at least partially compensate for inflation. If we could do that, then believe me this industry would be in a much better shape than it is today. We have not been able to do it in the last years because of competition. 

Q: But competitive pressures remain but yet you have some players now, Idea was talking about a tariff hike, so are you going to be able to follow suit? 

A: We will try to increase prices as I said because we need price increases due to inflation. Is that directly a related to the spectrum auctions? In my view, not. Spectrum auctions is something that happens, it happens once in 20 years for certain spectrum and certain places. That is not in itself the event that triggers it. It is more the situation that is the industry over time we will have to compensate for inflation and its prices.

Q: Let me ask you about the unfinished agenda – the Vodafone IPO. You in the past said that it was not held up because of the tax related issues but it was held up because investors had concerns about the uncertainty with regards to the regulatory environment. Now that you have been able to renew your license, the spectrum auctions are over and done with do you believe that it makes a business sense to go ahead for the IPO anytime soon?

A: Over and over we have said that being part of the Indian society in terms of a listed company here is probably the right thing to do over time.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Airtel, Idea, Vodafone partly pay their upfront amount

Successful spectrum bidders, including Bharti Airtel , Idea Cellular  and Vodafone, have made over Rs 7,000 crore towards upfront payments -- a move that will help the government narrow its fiscal deficit target for the fiscal ending on Tuesday.

Also, others telecom firms such as Reliance Jio and Tata Teleservices  that won airwaves in the recent spectrum auction have committed to pay by evening today. Airtel has paid about Rs 5,000 crore while Idea Cellular deposited around Rs 2,000 crore as part payment for spectrum they acquired in auction last week.

Vodafone has also paid some amount but the exact number could not be ascertained. "Bharti Airtel has paid about Rs 5,000 crore, Idea Cellular about Rs 2,000 crore. RJio has committed to pay entire upfront payment by this evening.

Tata Teleservices has also committed to pay some amount," an official source told Media. The source added that there is no response from Aircel and Reliance Communications  so far. The companies are rushing to make part payment before due date of April 8 following an appeal by Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to make payment by March 31.

"National revenue is equally important and so is the image of the country and this gesture of telecom operators will be highly appreciated," Prasad had said.

The spectrum auction, which concluded on March 25, fetched bids worth Rs 1,09,874.91 crore. Government has budgeted about Rs 9,500 crore as upfront realisation from spectrum auction and expected another Rs 5,000 crore more from sale of 3G spectrum.

The auction began on March 4 and after 19 days of fierce bidding it ended on March 25. As per rules, successful bidders are required to make payment within 10 days of government declaring final results.

As per the final results, Idea Cellular made maximum commitment of Rs 30,306.98 crore followed by Airtel at Rs 29,130.20 crore, Vodafone Rs 29,959.74 crore, Reliance Jio Infocomm Rs 10,077.53 crore, Reliance Communication Rs 4,299.13 crore, Tata Teleservices Rs 7,851.33 crore and Aircel Rs 2,250 crore.

However, telecom operators have agreed to make part payment to help country lower the fiscal deficit figure pegged at 4.1 per cent of GDP for financial year ending today.

As per DoT, the upfront payment due to Idea is Rs 7,790.1 crore; Airtel Rs 7,832.58 crore; Vodafone Rs 6,867.93 crore; Reliance Jio Rs 2,519.38 crore; Tata Teleservices Rs 2,013.33 crore; RCom Rs 1,106.95 crore and Aircel at Rs 742.5 crore.

Bharti Airtel stock price

On March 31, 2015, Bharti Airtel closed at Rs 393.90, up Rs 4.35, or 1.12 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 419.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 304.00.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 28.61 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 13.77. The latest book value of the company is Rs 166.93 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 2.36.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

LT bags Rs 1,432 cr defence order

L&T bags Rs 1,432 cr defence ordeOffshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) under the project are long range surface ships, capable of operation in maritime zones of India, including island territories with helicopter operational capabilities.

Larsen & Toubro today said it has bagged a contract worth Rs 1,432 crore from the Defence Ministry for design and construction of seven offshore patrol vessels for the Indian Coast Guard.

Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) under the project are long range surface ships, capable of operation in maritime zones of India, including island territories with helicopter operational capabilities.

Their roles include coastal and offshore patrolling, policing maritime zones of India, control and surveillance, anti-smuggling and anti-piracy with limited wartime roles. 

"In keeping with the government's 'Make in India' focus, complete design and engineering of OPVs is planned to be undertaken in-house at L&T's Warship Design Centre," Larsen & Toubro (L&T) said in a filing to BSE.

The first OPV under the project is scheduled to be delivered within 36 months from the signing of the contract. Subsequently, OPVs will be delivered at six month interval, it said.

L&T is already executing Defence Ministry's contracts for design and construction of 54 fast interceptor boats (IBs) for the Indian Coast Guard. 25 IBs have already been delivered so far. The company is targetting to complete delivery of all boats far ahead of schedule. 


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

SC seeks details of total mineral reserves in Karnataka

A 2-judge bench hearing the case has asked the state government to draw up a final assessment of all these 15 mines before April 10.

The Supreme Court Tuesday pulled up the Karnataka government for failing to assess the state's total mineral reserves. This even as it looks to auction 15 of the 51 category-C mines in the state.

A 2-judge bench hearing the case has asked the state government to draw up a final assessment of all these 15 mines before April 10. It will hear the miners' plea on seeking a hike in the present mining cap of 30 million tonnes per annum before deciding on the parameters of the upcoming auctions.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Snapdeal acquires majority stake in RupeePower

At present, it has 40 employees. "Over the next one year, we plan to ramp up our headcount to about 200 people. Most of these will be engineers, who have an understanding of the financial services market," RupeePower founder and CEO Tejasvi Mohanram said.

E-commerce major Snapdeal has picked up majority stake in digital financial products platform, RupeePower, for an undisclosed amount through a stock and cash deal. The move will help Snapdeal to enter the Rs 4,500 crore online financial services market in the country. "Consumers often face difficulty while deciding and buying financial products/services.

This partnership will help solve distribution challenges of the financial services ecosystem and make it more inclusive," Snapdeal co-founder and CEO Kunal Bahl told reporters. He declined to comment on the financial terms of the deal. Founded in 2011, Gurgaon-based RupeePower offers a digital distribution platform for loans, credit cards and other personal finance products.

At present, it has 40 employees. "Over the next one year, we plan to ramp up our headcount to about 200 people. Most of these will be engineers, who have an understanding of the financial services market," RupeePower founder and CEO Tejasvi Mohanram said.

RupeePower, which counts State Bank of India , ICICI Bank  and Bajaj Finserv  among its partners, claims to have enabled credit disbursal worth Rs 1,500 crore through its platform in FY2014-15. "In the next 24 months, we expect this number to grow to about Rs 6,000 crore (USD one billion)," Bahl said.

He added that going ahead, there will be integration of the platforms to allow Snapdeal consumers to make purchases using the finance options offered through RupeePower.

"The share of digital origination of credit is poised to grow from today's 7.5 percent to 40 percent over the next four years, in an Rs 400,000 crore (USD 67 billion) retail credit market growing at 20 percent annually," Mohanram said.

RupeePower aims to become the No 1 originator of financial products over the next couple of years with the investment received from Snapdeal, he added. Snapdeal also runs a 'Capital Assist' initiative, under which its helps its sellers to secure financing to expand their operations.

Launched in August last year, the company has already helped over 150 sellers raise over Rs 50 crore through the initiative. Asked if Snapdeal is looking at raising funds, Bahl replied in the negative. "We have used our funds in a very efficient manner.

Raising money is a full time job and we want to focus on our business. We want to bring entrepreneurs on board (who have products and solutions) because in the long term that will help sustain the business," he said. 

SBI stock price

On March 31, 2015, State Bank of India closed at Rs 267.00, down Rs 0.9, or 0.34 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 335.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 186.74.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 16.61 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 16.07. The latest book value of the company is Rs 158.43 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 1.69.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Ashok Leyland sells entire holding in Czech arm for $10.96m

Written By Unknown on Senin, 30 Maret 2015 | 21.03

In a filing to the BSE, the company said it has divested its entire stake of 100 percent ownership interest held in Avia Ashok Leyland Motors s.r.o. to a strategic investor as part of restructuring of investment in subsidiaries.

Hinduja Group flagship firm Ashok Leyland  on Monday announced selling its entire holding in Czech arm Avia Ashok Leyland Motors to an undisclosed 'strategic investor' for a cash realisation of USD 10.96 million.

In a filing to the BSE, the company said it has divested its entire stake of 100 percent ownership interest held in Avia Ashok Leyland Motors s.r.o. to a strategic investor as part of restructuring of investment in subsidiaries.

"The relevant agreements to this effect have been signed and closing of the deal has been completed," it said. Consequently, Avia Ashok Leyland Motors s.r.o. has ceased to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company with immediate effect, the filing said.

"The above transaction has resulted in cash realisation of USD 10.96 million to the company," it added. In 2006, Ashok Leyland had acquired Avia Truck Business Unit, a leading vehicle manufacturer in Europe, at an estimated cost of around USD 35 million and helped it expand in global markets, and also improve product portfolio.

It was later rechristened as AVIA Ashok Leyland Motors and produced a class of trucks with gross vehicle weights of 6.5 to 12 tonnes.

Due to a slowdown in Indian commercial vehicles market in the past couple of years, Ashok Leyland had announced VRS in 2013 to cut costs.

However, it has recovered to some extent in the past year. Its standalone net profit in the nine months ended December 31, 2014 stood at Rs 104.83 crore, while in the corresponding period a year ago, it had a net loss of Rs 334.01 crore.

Ashok Leyland shares closed 6.32 percent up at Rs 74 per scrip on the BSE on Monday.

Ashok Leyland stock price

On March 30, 2015, Ashok Leyland closed at Rs 74.00, up Rs 4.40, or 6.32 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 76.05 and the 52-week low was Rs 21.80.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 1.65 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 44.85. The latest book value of the company is Rs 15.69 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 4.72.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Auction results show reserve price not wrong: Telecom Secy

The availability of spectrum was not an issue in the auction, said Telecom Secretary Rakesh Garg. In an exclusive interview to CNBC-TV18's Malvika Jain, Garg said that he is confident that companies will be able to raise debt from the market as banks have faith in them and are ready to lend.'

The government has garnered over Rs 1 lakh crore from the recently-concluded telecom spectrum auction which went on for 19 days and 115 rounds. 

The government's aim was not to maximise revenue from spectrum sale, said Garg, adding that the telecom companies have made prudent business decisions. "The auction outcome proves that reserve price was not wrong," he said.

Below is the transcript of Rakesh Garg interview with CNBC-TV18's Malvika Jain

Q: The spectrum auctions have just concluded, the government has garnered Rs 109874 crore from sale of airwaves. However telecom companies – today we interviewed Idea Cellular, we have also been talking to the COAI, Bharti Airtel , Vodafone, all companies are complaining that it was the pressure of continuing their operations that promoted these companies to bid so aggressively and now that they have had to bid so aggressively it is the customer who is going to suffer, the tariffs will have to inevitably go up and going forward network expansion is also something that will slowdown.

A: I don't think this argument is correct. In fact what as a government we can do to ensure that the market is competitive and there is enough supply of the spectrum. What you can see in the present spectrum 67 percent of extra spectrum has been provided for the auctions. The expiring licences were given approximately 35 percent of the spectrum rest of that has come as a fresh spectrum. So, enough spectrum availability has been ensured in the market. So, with that enough availability of the spectrum and now much of it has been picked up. So, the spectrum availability in the market will increase.

If you see the amount of the money which has come through the spectrum auction - this spectrum has been given for 20 years and if you give it for 20 years per annum expenditure is hardly Rs 5300 crore and the turnover of this industry at the moment at the present rate is approximately Rs 2 lakh crore. When it is Rs 2 lakh crore Rs 5000 crore is not much. If you divided with the number of minutes which are being used that moment the whole amount of Rs 5300 crore it comes approximately 1.3 paisa per minute which is hardly any amount.

Q: This is an argument that has been put forth by the telecom minister as well but what telecom companies are saying is that they are going to now have to take more loans and they will come under debt. There is already Bharti Airtel which at the end of March 2014 had a debt burden of Rs 60542 crore. If you see Reliance Communication  Rs 41978 crore and Idea  and Vodafone also with a debt burden of around Rs 20000 crore. So, it is very difficult for the companies to take a business decision because on one hand it is about continuing their operations and on the other it is about increasing this debt burden. They are saying that this is one of the reasons why tariffs will have to go up.

A: Which industry runs without loans? All the big industries they have to take loan in their businesses. When the banks are give them loans that is based on stringent norms. They will not give loan until the industries are meeting those norms and the banks also do due diligence. All of these industries when you see they have a debt amount but they have debt servicing charges and whatever the debt servicing charges are after paying that thing all of them are in profit they are not making losses.

Once they are making profit and have been conscious and confident that this much of money they can raise from the banks and from the market that is why they have gone for auction. They have made a prudent business decision. I believe that they have faith in the present transparent government and the future telecom growth. Seeing those two things into account they have bid in the same. I am sure that they will be in a position to raise this much of loan from the market and from the banks.

Q: You don't feel that it was the limited availability of spectrum and the pressure on telecom companies to ensure that they must win back spectrum in renewal circles, that prompted the government and enabled the government to raise the kind of revenues that it has?

A: We have made that much of spectrum available that even this spectrum which we have made available, all of that has not been picked up. Even spectrum which was in 900 MHz band and came up for renewal, that too has been lapped up. Many companies have shifted from 900 MHz to 800 MHz and they have taken up 2100 MHz also. So, the availability of spectrum is definitely not an issue and once that is not a issue I don't think companies are going to face problem.

Q: Maximum bidding has taken place in the renewal circles how do you counter that?

A: This is their business decision. They have compared the different spectrum available and they have compared how much they are going to invest in 900 MHz and how much additional investment will be required in other band. Based on that – this is the first time when we have made them available such a big choice. All the spectrum auction has taken place simultaneously. They had a choice all the time throughout the auction to keep on comparing fifeerent bands and buying be it 900, 800 MHz, 1800 MHz or 2100 Mhz. This way their choice was much wider and whatever decision they have made they have made a very prudent decision. I am sure that will do good to them.

Q: While you say that telecom companies have made a prudent business decision a former Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal went a headed and said that the objective of the auction was profit maximisation, revenue maximisation and it was not maximising the customers experience and customers satisfaction. Do you feel that now even though you are saying that tariffs would not go up companies will use this as an opportunity to spike prices and ultimately it is the customer who is going to suffer?

A: What I will say if the government objective would had been to increase the revenue again then why should have they put up so much of new spectrum in all auction. It was not very difficult for us to keep the auction one after another. It was very easy for us not to bring the 21 megahertz from the army. This issue was pending for last 7-8 years the earlier government could not solve it.

In this government ultimately within a period of 3-4 months this matter was solved and we have put it on around the auction. Even the for 800 megahertz and 1,400 megahertz we have put all the spectrum which was available with the government on the auction. The purpose was basically the public should get the maximum possible benefits. For the government the consumer benefit is the biggest thing. 

For consumers' benefit it is necessary, the maximum possible spectrum should be used. That is why whatever spectrum was available with the government that was put on the auction. 

Q: What about consumer experience, consumers were waiting for roll out of 3G and 4G services. However, if you see the manner in which companies are rolling out 3G and 4G services it is pretty low and most of them are saying that it is simply because the revenues that they are bale to generate from sale of these services even though they are picking up is something that is not up to the mark and particularly 4G services roll out is suffering on account of the manner in which the data service penetration is taking place in the country and also these auctions which happened every year while it is the sources of revenue for the government the companies find it difficult to expand their network?

A: Whenever you have new spectrum there is no other way to give it to the telecom service provider other than the auction. So whenever you are saying auction is taken place every year this means more and more spectrum is being put to the market.

Q: But most of it is… because licences are coming up for renewal.

A: This is this time. But whatever, even this time only 35 percent as I told you was a spectrum which has come out of the RS which are expanding, rest of the spectrum is a new spectrum. So, this new spectrum coming in the market, definitely things are going to become better. And the biggest thing which has happened which people are not probably giving that much of attention. Whatever the 900 mhz has comes for the auction, this was earlier can be used only for the 2G services. Now this spectrum is liberalised spectrum, this can be used for 3G services, this can be used for LTE services and I am sure these companies will be putting it to better use through 3G and LTE services. And definitely the customer is going to get advantage of that. 

Q: Do you think the government's Digital India mission in any manner would get impacted because of the outcomes of these spectrum auctions? Even before the auctions actually kick started you have CEOs of the telecom companies including Marten Pieters from Vodafone saying that the high reserve price will eventually lead to a high market discovered price. And this is going to impact the Digital India mission of the government. 

A: The reserve price is important only whenever the things are going only at reserve price. But whenever after the reserve price, when the market is open for the competition, so when it is open, then they discover their own price and in most of the cases, out of the 61 offerings which have been taken up. more than 50 offerings have gone above the reserve price. And if they have gone above the reserve price, the reserve price becomes meaningless there in the sense that is not any bearing on the market discovered price. Market discovered its own price. In different band in different places, different kind of increase has taken over the reserve price. So, I do not think that the price was very high. In fact this auction, this auction has proved that our reserved price calculations was not wrong. They were right.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Warburg Pincus seeks $12 billion private equity fund

Private equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC has told investors it will seek to raise a new USD 12 billion global fund, just two years after amassing a USD 11.2 billion fund, according to people familiar with the matter.

The fundraising comes as other private equity firms such as Blackstone Group LP and Silver Lake Partners LP take between four to six years on average to spend their investors' money in global funds of similar size.

Private equity investors, which usually include public pension funds, insurance firms and sovereign wealth funds, prefer their money to be deployed quickly, assuming it's invested wisely.

The sources asked not to be identified because the fundraising process is confidential. Warburg Pincus declined to comment.

Warburg differs from most of its rivals because, in addition to investing in leveraged buyouts, which use debt to boost returns in acquired companies, it also makes venture capital and growth equity investments.

These investments, requiring little or no debt, help it deploy capital when leveraged buyouts are too expensive.

Leveraged buyouts have become pricier in recent years, partly because of the strong equity and debt markets, but also because of competition from buyout firms to spend the capital they have raised. Undeployed capital reached an industry record of USD 1.2 trillion in 2014, according to market research firm Preqin.

Warburg Pincus focuses more on venture capital and growth equity deals, which are typically smaller and less expensive, because they tend to be less visible and attract fewer rivals.

No other fund of Warburg's size combines leveraged buyouts with venture capital investing. The strategy requires Warburg to do more deals to put its funds to work.

Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI, the USD 11.2 billion fund that Warburg finished raising in 2013, has carried out more than 50 deals to date, with the average equity commitment at between USD 100 million and USD 200 million, according to the sources.

By comparison, the average deal of private equity funds sized between USD 8 billion and USD 12 billion has a value of USD 1.8 billion, according to Preqin.

FUND RETURNS

Private equity funds have a typical lifespan of ten years, and so it takes longer than two years to judge one's performance. Yet Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI's results so far have been encouraging.

Warburg Pincus Private Equity XI reported a net internal rate of return of 18.5 percent as of the end of September, according to State of Hawaii Employees' Retirement System, a public pension fund investor.

This compares to a 9.3 percent net internal rate of return for that public pension fund's entire private equity and venture capital portfolio.

The fund has invested in companies that include Venari Resources, a start-up focused on deepwater oil exploration and production in the Gulf of Mexico; China Auto Rental, a car rental company in China; and InComm, a global prepaid product, services and transaction technologies company.

To be sure, not all Warburg Pincus funds have done as well. The previous fund, the USD 15 billion Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, had a net internal rate of return of 9 percent as of the end of September. The USD 8 billion Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX had a net internal rate of return of 15.7 percent.

Warburg Pincus funds typically charge a management fee of 1.5 percent or less of the investor's capital and a performance fee of 20 percent of the fund's profits, according to the sources.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Wipro CFO says revenue growth to pick up in FY16

In an interview with Malvika Jain, Suresh Senapaty said the company's European business continues to remain under pressure.

Revenue growth for the country's third-largest software services exporter, Wipro , may see an uptick in FY16, outgoing CFO Suresh Senapaty told CNBC-TV18.

In an interview with Malvika Jain, Senapathy said the company's European business continues to remain under pressure – European revenues may also witness cross-currency headwinds. But he added that the Indian market was seeing a turnaround. Among sectors, oil & gas and energy sectors will continue to struggle.

Wipro's revenuegrowth rate has been below the industry rate for the past few years.

Senapaty also commented on the company's CEO hunt, after incumbent TK Kurien five-year term ends early next year, and said a nomination committee would decide on the successor and would consider both internal and external candidates.

On recently-appointed COO Abid Ali Neemuchwala's chances of staking out the top job, Senapathy said he remained "a possible contender".

Wipro stock price

On March 30, 2015, Wipro closed at Rs 623.50, up Rs 11.50, or 1.88 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 676.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 475.35.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 34.04 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 18.32. The latest book value of the company is Rs 118.90 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 5.24.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Telcos may hike rates to recover spectrum cost: Moody's

Indian telecom operators are expected to gradually increase rates to recover Rs 1.1 lakh crore they bid for spectrum in the auction that concluded last week, Moody's said Monday.

"This high cost is credit negative for the country's telecom operators because it will increase their debt and costs and reduce their ability to fund future expansion," said the global credit rating agency.

"Although we expect that the companies will raise tariffs in an effort to recover their spectrum costs, we believe the increases will be gradual, leaving the companies' debt levels bloated for some time," Moody's said in its March 30 issue.

Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, however, had said recently that as per an analysis shared with him by an expert, "the yearly load on telecom operators is going to be about Rs 5,300 crore...and 1.3 paise per minute call".

Moodys also said that the growing demand for 3G data services will continue to drive companies' spectrum cost recovery and it expects operators to maintain rational pricing, rather than cutting prices in an effort to increase volumes quickly.

Government received total payment commitment of Rs 1,09,874.91 crore from seven leading telecom operators in spectrum auction which ended on March 25.

As per the final results, Idea Cellular has made maximum commitment of Rs 30,306.98 crore followed by Airtel  at Rs 29,130.20 crore, Vodafone Rs 29,959.74 crore, Reliance Jio Infocomm Rs 10,077.53 crore, Reliance Communication  Rs 4,299.13 crore, Tata Teleservices  Rs 7,851.33 crore and Aircel of Rs 2,250 crore. Moody's said the total price the operators paid for the spectrum is around 35 per cent higher than the government's pre-set minimum prices and higher than in any previous Indian spectrum auction.

"These payments will cause debt levels to rise significantly for most operators, including Bharti Airtel Ltd.

(Baa3 stable) and Reliance Communications Limited (RCom, Ba3 stable), and will limit their ability to make additional investments over the next 12-24 months, possibly slowing the rollout of 3G/4G networks in India," Moody's said.

The rating firm said the companies will likely opt to defer their spectrum payments as it mitigates the effect on their cash flow. As per DoT, Idea will have to make upfront payment of Rs 7,790.1 crore; Airtel - Rs 7,832.58 crore; Vodafone - Rs 6,867.93 crore; Reliance Jio - Rs 2,519.38 crore; Tata Teleservices - Rs 2,013.33 crore; RCom - Rs 1,106.95 crore and Aircel - Rs 742.5 crore. 

Bharti Airtel stock price

On March 30, 2015, Bharti Airtel closed at Rs 389.55, up Rs 13.35, or 3.55 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 419.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 304.00.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 28.61 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 13.62. The latest book value of the company is Rs 166.93 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 2.33.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Reckitt Benckiser committed to ‘Stop Diarrhea’ proj: CEO

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 29 Maret 2015 | 21.03

India is the only island of growth amongst the emerging markets, that's how the CEO of Reckitt Benckiser, describes India and though he doesn't see the country growing in high double-digit over the next two years, Rakesh Kapoor is indeed very bullish on the country and says the global FMCG giant is in for the very long haul.

New launches are going to play a big role in the company's growth and it is betting big on the government's Swachh Bharat programme. The company has recently developed two hygiene products designed for the use and consumption at lower end of the pyramid, says Kapoor.

Kapoor said India's story is not about a quarter or even a year, it is a very long-term story and companies that have a very long view on India will make the right choices and make India a very important part of their business as indeed we want to make.

Talking about their other commitments towards India, Kapoor says, "RB is totally committed to the program called 'Stop Diarrhea' and would be investing over USD 30 milion over a number of years".

Moreover, the company also looks at divesting non-core assets, tail brands to focus on driving their core businesses like health, hygiene and home, says Kapoor.

"Just a few years ago everyone was super excited about Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). Everyone thought BRIC was the answer to economic challenges in the west but just a few years later Brazil is in a very tough place, Russia for both I would say political reasons but also economic reasons is not the same high profile economic growth that we have seen so in that context India becomes quite an island of growth for many companies. India remains very important not just for its own structural demographic and economic reasons but also in the context of global growth," he added. 

Kapoor further said that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which has headquarters in markets like Singapore, Indonesia will revert to Singapore through the ASEAN regional headquarters.

"In the past India was reporting into ASEAN which was reporting into our developing markets headquarters but now we have brought India straight line into reporting into developing markets headquarters so India actually has gone up, not gone down in the hierarchy if you want to measure it like that but India of course is, has been and will be a very important force of growth for RB," said Kapoor.

Answering a query on acquisitions, Kapoor says the company has always been open to making aquistions if they make strategic sense and if they create added value to shareholders.

Below is the transcript of Rakesh Kapoor's interview with Shereen Bhan on CNBC-TV18.

Q: The last conversation that you and I had was sometime in November, you were very confident about the India story, you were very confident about the signals coming in from the Modi government. Today, while the headline growth number looks very good, everyone is talking about 7.5 percent plus growth for India - consumption continues to be a worry, agricultural distress is a concern at this point in time impacting rural discretionary spending. What is your sense about the Indian market and growth in India at this point in time?

A: I would like to say that I remain very positive about the India story because my own personal view is that India story is not about a quarter or even a year; it is a very long-term story. Companies that have a very long view on India will make the right choices and make India very important part of their business as indeed we want to make.

The second thing I would like to say about India is that nothing changes very quickly here. It is the biggest anchor that you can think of. As long as the path is straight we will get there. I don't think we need to get super excited about changes that take place but also not get underwhelmed when things do not move fast enough. This is India, as long as directional fable is good - it seems to be a good one I think we will be on the right track.

The third important thing about India which I see particularly from my eyes sitting in London is that just a few years ago everyone was super excited about BRIC. Everyone thought BRIC was the answer to economic challenges in the West. However, just a few years later Brazil is in a very tough place, Russia for both political reasons but also economic reasons is not the same high profile economic growth that we have seen. So, in that context India becomes quite an island of growth for many companies. So, India remains very important not just for its own structural demographic and economic reasons but also in the context of global growth.

Q: You are speaking about the challenges facing emerging markets at this point in time and there continues to be concern on the deceleration as far as emerging markets are concerned. Even on your India growth figures your sales rose by about 11 percent to Rs 4000 crore in FY14. You were anticipating a growth rate of at least 20 percent I understand. What is the kind of growth projection that you have now for India in FY15 and FY16?

A: I don't set targets.

Q: Is a 20 percent growth rate unachievable at this point in time given the state of affairs?

A: This level of growth, the very high double digit growth rates that we have seen and we have come to expect and come to aspire to for India, remains our aspiration. I don't think we are going to give up on that. Will I see that in the next quarter, could I see that in the next year? Perhaps not but I don't believe we should lower our bar, I don't believe we should lower the ambition.

Our ambition remains to grow at the same kind of growth rates that we have all enjoyed, come to expect and want to have from India, even if the next quarter or even the next year does not seem to be as good. So, I don't want to set a target for FY15 at least externally. However, I do think that markets will improve in FY15 over FY14 and hopefully that will carry on in FY16 and FY17.

Q: Let me ask you about some of the efforts that you have rolled out in order to optimise costs. Project Supercharge was announced by you in February 2015. The idea behind that is to drive margin expansion to enable cost savings between 100-150 million pounds in 2015 and this also involved in creating a simpler and more agile corporate structure. What will this mean for markets like India?

A: First of all I think, Supercharge is an important project for Reckitt Benckiser (RB). It has like you just said two major vectors. One vector is having a company which is faster to market, which is simpler to operate, which does not get bogged down by the complexities that we all see in our world today. So, how do we become more agile? RB has enjoyed the fantastic history of growth and outperformance over the number of years but when organisations become bigger they become complex.

One of my challenges is to make sure that we can keep this company simpler. So, we simplified our structure, we have made sure that inside the company for example we used to have two different area organisations – one looking after Russia, Middle East and Africa and the other one looking after Latin America, Asia-Pacific. We have combined those area organisations and provided a simpler governance and decision making structure here as one example of a simpler organisation. Removing the multiple decision making touch points that sometimes exists in large companies to simplify how we decide, how we go to market.

The other aspect is for larger companies to constantly interrogate their cost of doing business. I have always said that costs are like finger nails, they need to be cut from time-to time. This program of Supercharge is to look at all areas of cost and thinking about where we have waste, where we have duplication, where can we buy things cheaper? We have point of sale material that we buy in multiple markets on multiple brands around the world. Couldn't we buy them together, couldn't we buy them cheaper, and couldn't we simplify that?

Q: What about divesting assets which may no longer be core to you or divesting brands which may no longer be core to you?

A: That is something that we have done from time to time. If you think about the last three years we have demerged our pharmaceutical business and created a new company called Indivior. We have divested our footwear business and given that out. There is a lot of rationalisation that has taken place in the tail brands. So, that has been an important part of our focus on driving the core business in health, hygiene and home.

Q: What more can we expect in terms of divesting or getting out of brands that no longer fit into the company's current profile and the effort to continue to boost your healthcare business?

A: About three years ago, 80 percent of our business was health, hygiene and home and 20 percent was of the rest and today it is only 8 percent. So, you are talking about a pie which has shrunk from 20 percent to 8 percent. So, divestment focus has taken place and we will continue to do that. Our larger opportunities are not just to think about divestments and tail brands rationalisation, I think it is to drive our focus on consumer health, on hygiene.

Just to give you a very simple story here – I came off the plane, went straight to Dakshinpuri in South Delhi. Dakshinpuri in South Delhi is like one of the many suburban places we have in Delhi but also in many parts of India. When you think about so many, there were about 20,000 people who live in a very small place – five people in one small room of 10 feet by 10 feet, open drains, water condition is not very hygienic, toilets not very clean and the fact of the matter is you have got hygiene issues there. With hygiene issues you have got health issues.

I am very proud of many things about India as an Indian, as somebody who has been born and brought up here and owe everything to India but the one thing I am not proud of is the fact that in this country you have something like a 120,000 deaths taking place from diarrhea alone. When you add it all together, in the world we live in today there is one child dying of diarrhea every minute. By the time you and I finish this conversation 15 of these young children under the age of five would have died of diarrhea.

It is highly preventable; it is something we have to avoid. RB today is very proud to announce a program of 'Stop Diarrhea'. This is where we are investing over a number of years, over USD 30 million. We want to make sure that we not only invest this money but we have actually committed R&D resources, our people to bring change and to take care of diarrhea.

So, the larger opportunity in our company is not just to think about tail brands divestment, it is about to bring health, hygiene in markets that we operate in because that is good for people, that is good for society and that is good for the economy. There is so much economic loss that takes place because of bad health and that is good for my company.

Q: Any change expected from a corporate point of view because India so far has been the regional headquarters for South East Asia covering about 12 nations including Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia, will that stay, are there any changes expected on that front?

A: There will be, I think India will revert to its very important position as a regional hub for South Asia. However, the ASEAN headquarters which is markets like Singapore, Indonesia, etc will revert to Singapore through the ASEAN regional headquarters.

Q: Any reason for why you are doing this at this point in time given the fact that you anticipate strong growth in India and you anticipate India to be one of your key drivers not just from a sales point of view but also from an innovation point of view?

A: I think there is a very clear reason. We want to give India a very special place in our company's hierarchy if you want to call it like that. In the past India was reporting into ASEAN which was reporting into our developing markets headquarters. However, now we have brought India straight line into reporting into developing markets hedquarters. So, India has gone up, not gone down in the hierarchy if you want to measure it like that. India is, has been and will be a very important force of growth for RB.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Posco seeks refund from Odisha rail line undertaking

South Korean steel giant Posco has sought refund from a rail line undertaking to be set up in partnership with Odhisa government citing change in company law but said it wasn't pulling out from the USD 12 billion steel project in the state.

"For railway (SPV we) cannot continue keeping deposit any further due to changed company law," Posco India Spokesperson IG Lee said.

Posco had joined hands with the state government along with SAIL, Rail Vikas Nigam and other players in 2006 to form a Rs 590 crore special purpose vehicle (SPV) for development of a 78-km long Paradip-Haridaspur rail line in Odhisa. 

Denying reports that the company is pulling out from the multi-billion project in the state, he said: "We are still on Odisha project. Money refund is not for the steel plant land. Rail Infra refund is as per the changed company law last year."

Lee also said six employees have "voluntarily" resigned and denied it was any sign of Posco pulling out from the project.

The steel maker's proposed USD 12 billion project at Jagatsinghpur district in Odisha for producing 12 million tonne per annum (MTPA) is viewed as the largest FDI in India.

It has, however, been stalled for about a decade on account of regulatory hurdles, including delays in land acquisition.

Posco had entered into a pact with Odisha government on June 22, 2005 for the plant, which included iron ore mine development.

However apart from the delays, in a fresh blow to the company, last month the Centre said the company would be required to participate in auction to get iron ore mines to feed its facility instead of direct allotment as assured earlier.

Steel Minister Narendra Singh Tomar had said that the company, which was assured Khandadhar iron-ore mine via dispensation route will have to participate in the auction process to get a mining lease.

Posco was previously promised the Khandadhar iron ore mine by the state for its mega steel plant, considered as the biggest FDI in India, but the actual allocation never happened due to delays in regulatory approvals.

Although the company has a memorandum of understanding with the Odisha government that assured allocation of mining leases, the passage of a Bill in Parliament that made allocation of all mines through auction route only, the agreement with the state will have no value.

In 2013, Posco had scrapped the 6 MT steel project in Karnataka over land and mineral hurdles. The Odisha project was also scaled down to initial 8 MT after it failed to acquire the desired quantity of land.

Last month POSCO had inaugurated a USD 709 million steel mill in Maharashtra to scale up its presence in the country.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Power firms face huge under recovery in fuel cost: ICRA

Aggressive bidding seen in the auction of 33 mines would result in a significant under-recovery in fuel cost estimated at Rs 1,800 crore by financial year 2017-18 for the winning bidders in power sector, rating agency Icra said.

It also said cancellation of blocks has impacted capacity in private IPP (independent power producer) segment to the tune of 18 GW.

"Bidding by power generating companies in the auction has been quite aggressive ...As a result, winning bidders remain exposed to a significant under-recovery in fuel cost... Aggregate under-recovery for the bidders is estimated at Rs 8 billion in FY 2015-16, which is likely to increase to about Rs 18 billion by FY 2017-18," it said in a report.

The government has so far auctioned 33 blocks in two tranches garnering over Rs 2 lakh crore, a figure surpassing the Comptroller and Auditor General's estimates of losses of Rs 1.86 lakh crore on account of allocation without auction of mines.

Icra said that of the 33 blocks, 12 were earmarked for the power sector and the government has announced successful bidders for nine mines which have geological reserves of 1200 million tonnes of which extractable reserves are 60 percent.

These blocks are "estimated to provide a fuel security for about 6 GW of generation capacity in the power sector, in ICRA's view".

"ICRA notes that the bidding by power generating companies in the auction has been quite aggressive with the bidding happening on a forward basis on the reserve price payable as bid quoted is zero in reverse bidding," it said.

It added that the bids quoted by the successful bidders range from Rs 302 per tonne to Rs 1,110 per tonne which are "negative price bids" for the bidders "which essentially means that a winning bidder would have a zero fuel charge recovery in PPA and in addition would bear the cost of both i.e. cost of coal mining and quoted reserve price payable to State Government".

It said that as a result, the winning bidders will remain exposed to significant under-recovery in fuel cost which is "estimated to range from Rs 0.39/kwh to Rs 1.02/kwh on a levelised basis over a 25-year period."

Further it said the quantum of under-recovery in fuel cost would remain sensitive to both the stripping ratio of the coal mine and cost of mining related to over-burden removal during the operating phase.

"ICRA estimates that the SC ruling cancelling allotment of coal blocks had impacted capacity in private IPP segment to the tune of 18 GW and the current coal auctions have secured fuel for 2.5 GW out of those 18 GW," it said.

Thus, capacity of about 15.5 GW (with cumulative project cost at around Rs 930 billion) continues to remain affected and within the same, about 8 GW is at risk also due to absence of tapering coal linkage.

The Supreme Court in September last year had cancelled allocation of 204 mines terming same as "fatally flawed" necessitating the auctions.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Airtel, RCom gain capability for 4G service across country

Reliance Communications made bids worth Rs 4,299 crore and is required to make an upfront payment of Rs 1,106 crore.

Bharti Airtel  and Reliance Communications  (RCom) have gained capability to provide 4G services across the country as they bagged requisite spectrum in the recently concluded spectrum auction.

RIL's telecom arm Reliance Jio already has pan-India 4G spectrum.

"RCom becomes India's first and only operator with nationwide footprint of contiguous 800/850 MHz spectrum. RCom operations now future-proofed across all circles for most advanced LTE technology at most optimal cost," the company said in a statement.

Airtel, the country's leading telecom operator, in a statement said, "Post the latest spectrum acquisition, Bharti Airtel's spectrum mix will give it unmatched reach in the mobile data segment across 3G and 4G with a pan-India footprint."

The telecom firm now directly holds spectrum for 3G service in all parts of the country, except in Kolkata.

Reliance Communications made bids worth Rs 4,299 crore and is required to make an upfront payment of Rs 1,106 crore.

The company won 800 MHz spectrum in 11 service areas, but could not defend its 900 MHz spectrum holding in five out of seven circles expiring in 2015-16.

However, RCom spectrum holding in 800 Mhz in some parts of the country cannot be used to offer 4G service as the matter is sub-judice or to start 4G service using those airwaves it will have to pay one-time spectrum fee of Rs 173 crore demanded by government.

Reliance Jio has also added two sets of spectrum-800 Mhz in 10 circles and additional 1800 Mhz in six circles, to boost its 4G services with stable voice calling service.

Bharti Airtel stock price

On March 27, 2015, Bharti Airtel closed at Rs 376.20, down Rs 22.5, or 5.64 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 419.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 299.80.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 28.61 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 13.15. The latest book value of the company is Rs 166.93 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 2.25.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Multiples PE to invest at faster pace over next 2-yrs: CEO

Talking about the investment cycle in India, Multiples PE is basically a sector agnostic fund and looks at opportunities in each and every sector, says managing director and chief financial officer, Prakash Nene.

Multiples Alternate Asset Management Private Limited (Multiples) is an investment advisory firm that manages more than USD 400 million of Private Equity Funds. Multiples believes there are three ingredients to successful investing in India – careful selection based on conviction in the entrepreneur and opportunity; finding a solution beyond just providing capital; and mutual selection between the entrepreneur and the fund.

Multiples PE is now coming out with a second fund which is a 10-year fund with commitment amount of USD 650 million to be invested in 5-year time frame. However, they would be aggressively investing in the first two years on back of hopes that the Indian economy is now turning around, says Nene.

We are quite positive about the changes which are being made on the economic front. There are many incremental changes which are taking place and that is very heartening," adds Nene.

Althought the fund is sectors agnostic, spaces banking financial insurance (BFSI), e-commerce, healthcare will continue to be most attractive sectors, says Nene.

Below is the transcript of Prakash Nene's interview with CNBC-TV18's Kritika Saxena.

Q: Multiples PE since 2010 till date has been a roaring success if you compare it to the other domestic funds. You have raised USD 300 million funds which have been deployed already. How has the growth been given the fact that investing climate has been slightly slow ever since you setup. How have you been able to retain the investment pace and get the kind of success that you have gotten already?

A: We started in 2010 and the fund is slight bigger than what you thought because the dollar has depreciated otherwise we started with USD 400 million commitment. In terms of pace of investment we have been doing investment on a steady basis every year. We have a very strong investment team and lot of us came from another private equity venture and everybody is very experienced. So, we know the game and after all with all this whatever you do ultimately there has to be some external factors also which lead to success. So, we have to be very careful about where do you invest. In fact when you say our pace investment has been good, to begin with our pace of investment was very slow. We were very measured, our first investment took about a year to make.

Thereafter we really gathered pace because the team has to come together. Once the team came together that is how we started going forward at a faster pace.

Q: In your first fund what were your focus areas in terms of the average ticket size that you are looking at and the sectoral focus?

A: We are sector agnostic fund. We look at opportunity in each and every sector. In terms of verticals we look at certain percentage – 10-15 percent for early stage companies and rest of the companies are later stage companies. Our bias is towards later stage companies because our ticket size will be larger than early stage companies. So, USD 30 million would be our ticket size in the first fund. Obviously in the second fund it will be larger than that.

Q: Let us talk about your second fund; USD 500 million is the amount that you are looking at raising. What is the process and by when will you start deploying that? The fund amount is larger than what your other peer, which have seen average of USD 150-300 million, so what really according to you would be the focus areas and do you feel that now that this is a larger fund you would have a larger investment power to invest over the next couple of years?

A: First of all USD 500 million would be the main fund. We also have another vehicle. So, our total amount available for commitment will be USD 650 million. So, we would be deploying USD 650 million which is the target of this fund. We would be deploying that in just a matter of time now, we already have lot of commitments from our core investors. They are all coming back with larger tickets, so we have a number of documents already with us. We are just waiting to do a formal close.

Q: Typically, USD 650 million, roughly across how many year do you see that spanning out or rather the majority investment, would it be a 5 or 10 year timeframe?

A: Technically, the fund is a 10-year fund but what we call as commitment period, the commitment period would be about 5 years. So, 5 year is the timeframe where most of the investment will be made. However thereafter as well once you invest in a company there is a follow-on investment. The companies keep needing money from time to time and it is not that after 5 years company will not require any money. So, you set aside some amount 10-15 percent for follow-on investments beyond 5 years.

For the first 5 years normally we invest at a steady pace. It is not that you have to just divide by 5 and every year you invest USD 120 million. Our bias would be more towards the early years. So, the first couple of years we perhaps would be investing at a faster pace than the earlier year because we are quite positive that the economy is now turning around.

Q: Since 2010 till 2014 things were fairly difficult but the new government came in and we have seen things turn on ground. We have been talking about how the ease of doing business is now one of the top priorities for the government and how there is a pickup in the reform cycle. Do you feel that foreign investors are now looking at India differently and more positively in 2015 than they did in the last two years?

A: Absolutely. I would not say the last two years, I would say year before 2014, the pace of investment all of us know was very slow and things were pretty gloomy. However last year has been a decent year I would say. In the private equity sector I think about 400-450 deals have happened and the capital deployed is about USD 11 billion, which is a sizeable sum which was deployed. Exits have also improved now. Last year we had about USD 4-5 billion of exits and I think that pace will continue.

We are quite positive about the changes which are being made on the economic front. There are not too many what they call big bang changes, lot of people expect that suddenly things will be different and that doesn't happen but I would say there are many incremental changes which are taking place and that is very heartening. We believe that the government's policies are moving in the right direction. However once you change a policy there is some time lag once the economic activity picks up. So, on the ground the economic activity especially in manufacturing sector is yet to pickup, it is slowly picking up but certain other sectors things have started moving faster. So, we are looking very positively, the next two years that is the reason I said that perhaps the pace of investment which we are going to make in the next couple of years will be faster.

Q: Let us talk about taxation in that case; in the Budget this time around the government has created a big positive for the PE industry by allowing tax pass throughs. How significant is that for PE players and for Multiples PE?

A: I would say that pass through is one of the things which the domestic industry was looking forward to and which has now been granted. It is definitely positive for the industry. However what happens is that what you do at one place, you do something else in another place. What has been introduced in this Budget is something called Place of Effective Management (P.O.E.M). In the speech the Finance Minister has said that they are encouraging Indian fund managers like us to really manage foreign money without going abroad. Many of our colleagues have moved abroad simply from that angle.

Place of effective management is considered if you are based in India and if you are managing money in Mauritius or in other jurisdictions and those funds are called resident in India. If those funds are resident in India then they are not eligible for what is called treaty benefits. So, that is one clause – P.O.E.M has come.

Government has created what they call safe harbour rules. Safe harbour rules mean certain sectors of the economy and certain fund managers would be excluded. However what I find that most of those changes which have been made they are for FIIs – foreign institutional investors. Government has not looked very carefully as to what are the requirements of a fund manager who is not an FII but using FDI money.

FII is a regulated concept under Sebi but most of the funds especially private equity funds are not of that type. We typically will have 5-25 investors and not hundreds of investors. So, when you say that no single investor can have more than 10 percent in a company and all of us have an anchor investor which will be more than 10 percent. So, in that situation we will be excluded then you say 5 investors put together cannot own more than 10 percent and you cannot do a buyout.

Even in our first fund we own a company which is completely owned by us – 100 percent and buyout is a very important concept for a private equity. When a policy framework is made this is something which looks like inadvertently it has not been taken into account and I am quite hopeful that before the Budget is finally approved I think there will be some changes on this.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Reckitt Benckiser committed to ‘Stop Diarrhea’ proj: CEO

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 28 Maret 2015 | 21.03

India is the only island of growth amongst the emerging markets, that's how the CEO of Reckitt Benckiser, describes India and though he doesn't see the country growing in high double-digit over the next two years, Rakesh Kapoor is indeed very bullish on the country and says the global FMCG giant is in for the very long haul.

New launches are going to play a big role in the company's growth and it is betting big on the government's Swachh Bharat programme. The company has recently developed two hygiene products designed for the use and consumption at lower end of the pyramid, says Kapoor.

Kapoor said India's story is not about a quarter or even a year, it is a very long-term story and companies that have a very long view on India will make the right choices and make India a very important part of their business as indeed we want to make.

Talking about their other commitments towards India, Kapoor says, "RB is totally committed to the program called 'Stop Diarrhea' and would be investing over USD 30 milion over a number of years".

Moreover, the company also looks at divesting non-core assets, tail brands to focus on driving their core businesses like health, hygiene and home, says Kapoor.

"Just a few years ago everyone was super excited about Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). Everyone thought BRIC was the answer to economic challenges in the west but just a few years later Brazil is in a very tough place, Russia for both I would say political reasons but also economic reasons is not the same high profile economic growth that we have seen so in that context India becomes quite an island of growth for many companies. India remains very important not just for its own structural demographic and economic reasons but also in the context of global growth," he added. 

Kapoor further said that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which has headquarters in markets like Singapore, Indonesia will revert to Singapore through the ASEAN regional headquarters.

"In the past India was reporting into ASEAN which was reporting into our developing markets headquarters but now we have brought India straight line into reporting into developing markets headquarters so India actually has gone up, not gone down in the hierarchy if you want to measure it like that but India of course is, has been and will be a very important force of growth for RB," said Kapoor.

Answering a query on acquisitions, Kapoor says the company has always been open to making aquistions if they make strategic sense and if they create added value to shareholders.

Below is the transcript of Rakesh Kapoor's interview with Shereen Bhan on CNBC-TV18.

Q: The last conversation that you and I had was sometime in November, you were very confident about the India story, you were very confident about the signals coming in from the Modi government. Today, while the headline growth number looks very good, everyone is talking about 7.5 percent plus growth for India - consumption continues to be a worry, agricultural distress is a concern at this point in time impacting rural discretionary spending. What is your sense about the Indian market and growth in India at this point in time?

A: I would like to say that I remain very positive about the India story because my own personal view is that India story is not about a quarter or even a year; it is a very long-term story. Companies that have a very long view on India will make the right choices and make India very important part of their business as indeed we want to make.

The second thing I would like to say about India is that nothing changes very quickly here. It is the biggest anchor that you can think of. As long as the path is straight we will get there. I don't think we need to get super excited about changes that take place but also not get underwhelmed when things do not move fast enough. This is India, as long as directional fable is good - it seems to be a good one I think we will be on the right track.

The third important thing about India which I see particularly from my eyes sitting in London is that just a few years ago everyone was super excited about BRIC. Everyone thought BRIC was the answer to economic challenges in the West. However, just a few years later Brazil is in a very tough place, Russia for both political reasons but also economic reasons is not the same high profile economic growth that we have seen. So, in that context India becomes quite an island of growth for many companies. So, India remains very important not just for its own structural demographic and economic reasons but also in the context of global growth.

Q: You are speaking about the challenges facing emerging markets at this point in time and there continues to be concern on the deceleration as far as emerging markets are concerned. Even on your India growth figures your sales rose by about 11 percent to Rs 4000 crore in FY14. You were anticipating a growth rate of at least 20 percent I understand. What is the kind of growth projection that you have now for India in FY15 and FY16?

A: I don't set targets.

Q: Is a 20 percent growth rate unachievable at this point in time given the state of affairs?

A: This level of growth, the very high double digit growth rates that we have seen and we have come to expect and come to aspire to for India, remains our aspiration. I don't think we are going to give up on that. Will I see that in the next quarter, could I see that in the next year? Perhaps not but I don't believe we should lower our bar, I don't believe we should lower the ambition.

Our ambition remains to grow at the same kind of growth rates that we have all enjoyed, come to expect and want to have from India, even if the next quarter or even the next year does not seem to be as good. So, I don't want to set a target for FY15 at least externally. However, I do think that markets will improve in FY15 over FY14 and hopefully that will carry on in FY16 and FY17.

Q: Let me ask you about some of the efforts that you have rolled out in order to optimise costs. Project Supercharge was announced by you in February 2015. The idea behind that is to drive margin expansion to enable cost savings between 100-150 million pounds in 2015 and this also involved in creating a simpler and more agile corporate structure. What will this mean for markets like India?

A: First of all I think, Supercharge is an important project for Reckitt Benckiser (RB). It has like you just said two major vectors. One vector is having a company which is faster to market, which is simpler to operate, which does not get bogged down by the complexities that we all see in our world today. So, how do we become more agile? RB has enjoyed the fantastic history of growth and outperformance over the number of years but when organisations become bigger they become complex.

One of my challenges is to make sure that we can keep this company simpler. So, we simplified our structure, we have made sure that inside the company for example we used to have two different area organisations – one looking after Russia, Middle East and Africa and the other one looking after Latin America, Asia-Pacific. We have combined those area organisations and provided a simpler governance and decision making structure here as one example of a simpler organisation. Removing the multiple decision making touch points that sometimes exists in large companies to simplify how we decide, how we go to market.

The other aspect is for larger companies to constantly interrogate their cost of doing business. I have always said that costs are like finger nails, they need to be cut from time-to time. This program of Supercharge is to look at all areas of cost and thinking about where we have waste, where we have duplication, where can we buy things cheaper? We have point of sale material that we buy in multiple markets on multiple brands around the world. Couldn't we buy them together, couldn't we buy them cheaper, and couldn't we simplify that?

Q: What about divesting assets which may no longer be core to you or divesting brands which may no longer be core to you?

A: That is something that we have done from time to time. If you think about the last three years we have demerged our pharmaceutical business and created a new company called Indivior. We have divested our footwear business and given that out. There is a lot of rationalisation that has taken place in the tail brands. So, that has been an important part of our focus on driving the core business in health, hygiene and home.

Q: What more can we expect in terms of divesting or getting out of brands that no longer fit into the company's current profile and the effort to continue to boost your healthcare business?

A: About three years ago, 80 percent of our business was health, hygiene and home and 20 percent was of the rest and today it is only 8 percent. So, you are talking about a pie which has shrunk from 20 percent to 8 percent. So, divestment focus has taken place and we will continue to do that. Our larger opportunities are not just to think about divestments and tail brands rationalisation, I think it is to drive our focus on consumer health, on hygiene.

Just to give you a very simple story here – I came off the plane, went straight to Dakshinpuri in South Delhi. Dakshinpuri in South Delhi is like one of the many suburban places we have in Delhi but also in many parts of India. When you think about so many, there were about 20,000 people who live in a very small place – five people in one small room of 10 feet by 10 feet, open drains, water condition is not very hygienic, toilets not very clean and the fact of the matter is you have got hygiene issues there. With hygiene issues you have got health issues.

I am very proud of many things about India as an Indian, as somebody who has been born and brought up here and owe everything to India but the one thing I am not proud of is the fact that in this country you have something like a 120,000 deaths taking place from diarrhea alone. When you add it all together, in the world we live in today there is one child dying of diarrhea every minute. By the time you and I finish this conversation 15 of these young children under the age of five would have died of diarrhea.

It is highly preventable; it is something we have to avoid. RB today is very proud to announce a program of 'Stop Diarrhea'. This is where we are investing over a number of years, over USD 30 million. We want to make sure that we not only invest this money but we have actually committed R&D resources, our people to bring change and to take care of diarrhea.

So, the larger opportunity in our company is not just to think about tail brands divestment, it is about to bring health, hygiene in markets that we operate in because that is good for people, that is good for society and that is good for the economy. There is so much economic loss that takes place because of bad health and that is good for my company.

Q: Any change expected from a corporate point of view because India so far has been the regional headquarters for South East Asia covering about 12 nations including Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia, will that stay, are there any changes expected on that front?

A: There will be, I think India will revert to its very important position as a regional hub for South Asia. However, the ASEAN headquarters which is markets like Singapore, Indonesia, etc will revert to Singapore through the ASEAN regional headquarters.

Q: Any reason for why you are doing this at this point in time given the fact that you anticipate strong growth in India and you anticipate India to be one of your key drivers not just from a sales point of view but also from an innovation point of view?

A: I think there is a very clear reason. We want to give India a very special place in our company's hierarchy if you want to call it like that. In the past India was reporting into ASEAN which was reporting into our developing markets headquarters. However, now we have brought India straight line into reporting into developing markets hedquarters. So, India has gone up, not gone down in the hierarchy if you want to measure it like that. India is, has been and will be a very important force of growth for RB.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Airtel, RCom gain capability for 4G service across country

Reliance Communications made bids worth Rs 4,299 crore and is required to make an upfront payment of Rs 1,106 crore.

Bharti Airtel  and Reliance Communications  (RCom) have gained capability to provide 4G services across the country as they bagged requisite spectrum in the recently concluded spectrum auction.

RIL's telecom arm Reliance Jio already has pan-India 4G spectrum.

"RCom becomes India's first and only operator with nationwide footprint of contiguous 800/850 MHz spectrum. RCom operations now future-proofed across all circles for most advanced LTE technology at most optimal cost," the company said in a statement.

Airtel, the country's leading telecom operator, in a statement said, "Post the latest spectrum acquisition, Bharti Airtel's spectrum mix will give it unmatched reach in the mobile data segment across 3G and 4G with a pan-India footprint."

The telecom firm now directly holds spectrum for 3G service in all parts of the country, except in Kolkata.

Reliance Communications made bids worth Rs 4,299 crore and is required to make an upfront payment of Rs 1,106 crore.

The company won 800 MHz spectrum in 11 service areas, but could not defend its 900 MHz spectrum holding in five out of seven circles expiring in 2015-16.

However, RCom spectrum holding in 800 Mhz in some parts of the country cannot be used to offer 4G service as the matter is sub-judice or to start 4G service using those airwaves it will have to pay one-time spectrum fee of Rs 173 crore demanded by government.

Reliance Jio has also added two sets of spectrum-800 Mhz in 10 circles and additional 1800 Mhz in six circles, to boost its 4G services with stable voice calling service.

Bharti Airtel stock price

On March 27, 2015, Bharti Airtel closed at Rs 376.20, down Rs 22.5, or 5.64 percent. The 52-week high of the share was Rs 419.90 and the 52-week low was Rs 299.80.


The company's trailing 12-month (TTM) EPS was at Rs 28.61 per share as per the quarter ended December 2014. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was 13.15. The latest book value of the company is Rs 166.93 per share. At current value, the price-to-book value of the company is 2.25.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Posco seeks refund from Odisha rail line undertaking

South Korean steel giant Posco has sought refund from a rail line undertaking to be set up in partnership with Odhisa government citing change in company law but said it wasn't pulling out from the USD 12 billion steel project in the state.

"For railway (SPV we) cannot continue keeping deposit any further due to changed company law," Posco India Spokesperson IG Lee said.

Posco had joined hands with the state government along with SAIL, Rail Vikas Nigam and other players in 2006 to form a Rs 590 crore special purpose vehicle (SPV) for development of a 78-km long Paradip-Haridaspur rail line in Odhisa. 

Denying reports that the company is pulling out from the multi-billion project in the state, he said: "We are still on Odisha project. Money refund is not for the steel plant land. Rail Infra refund is as per the changed company law last year."

Lee also said six employees have "voluntarily" resigned and denied it was any sign of Posco pulling out from the project.

The steel maker's proposed USD 12 billion project at Jagatsinghpur district in Odisha for producing 12 million tonne per annum (MTPA) is viewed as the largest FDI in India.

It has, however, been stalled for about a decade on account of regulatory hurdles, including delays in land acquisition.

Posco had entered into a pact with Odisha government on June 22, 2005 for the plant, which included iron ore mine development.

However apart from the delays, in a fresh blow to the company, last month the Centre said the company would be required to participate in auction to get iron ore mines to feed its facility instead of direct allotment as assured earlier.

Steel Minister Narendra Singh Tomar had said that the company, which was assured Khandadhar iron-ore mine via dispensation route will have to participate in the auction process to get a mining lease.

Posco was previously promised the Khandadhar iron ore mine by the state for its mega steel plant, considered as the biggest FDI in India, but the actual allocation never happened due to delays in regulatory approvals.

Although the company has a memorandum of understanding with the Odisha government that assured allocation of mining leases, the passage of a Bill in Parliament that made allocation of all mines through auction route only, the agreement with the state will have no value.

In 2013, Posco had scrapped the 6 MT steel project in Karnataka over land and mineral hurdles. The Odisha project was also scaled down to initial 8 MT after it failed to acquire the desired quantity of land.

Last month POSCO had inaugurated a USD 709 million steel mill in Maharashtra to scale up its presence in the country.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Power firms face huge under recovery in fuel cost: ICRA

Aggressive bidding seen in the auction of 33 mines would result in a significant under-recovery in fuel cost estimated at Rs 1,800 crore by financial year 2017-18 for the winning bidders in power sector, rating agency Icra said.

It also said cancellation of blocks has impacted capacity in private IPP (independent power producer) segment to the tune of 18 GW.

"Bidding by power generating companies in the auction has been quite aggressive ...As a result, winning bidders remain exposed to a significant under-recovery in fuel cost... Aggregate under-recovery for the bidders is estimated at Rs 8 billion in FY 2015-16, which is likely to increase to about Rs 18 billion by FY 2017-18," it said in a report.

The government has so far auctioned 33 blocks in two tranches garnering over Rs 2 lakh crore, a figure surpassing the Comptroller and Auditor General's estimates of losses of Rs 1.86 lakh crore on account of allocation without auction of mines.

Icra said that of the 33 blocks, 12 were earmarked for the power sector and the government has announced successful bidders for nine mines which have geological reserves of 1200 million tonnes of which extractable reserves are 60 percent.

These blocks are "estimated to provide a fuel security for about 6 GW of generation capacity in the power sector, in ICRA's view".

"ICRA notes that the bidding by power generating companies in the auction has been quite aggressive with the bidding happening on a forward basis on the reserve price payable as bid quoted is zero in reverse bidding," it said.

It added that the bids quoted by the successful bidders range from Rs 302 per tonne to Rs 1,110 per tonne which are "negative price bids" for the bidders "which essentially means that a winning bidder would have a zero fuel charge recovery in PPA and in addition would bear the cost of both i.e. cost of coal mining and quoted reserve price payable to State Government".

It said that as a result, the winning bidders will remain exposed to significant under-recovery in fuel cost which is "estimated to range from Rs 0.39/kwh to Rs 1.02/kwh on a levelised basis over a 25-year period."

Further it said the quantum of under-recovery in fuel cost would remain sensitive to both the stripping ratio of the coal mine and cost of mining related to over-burden removal during the operating phase.

"ICRA estimates that the SC ruling cancelling allotment of coal blocks had impacted capacity in private IPP segment to the tune of 18 GW and the current coal auctions have secured fuel for 2.5 GW out of those 18 GW," it said.

Thus, capacity of about 15.5 GW (with cumulative project cost at around Rs 930 billion) continues to remain affected and within the same, about 8 GW is at risk also due to absence of tapering coal linkage.

The Supreme Court in September last year had cancelled allocation of 204 mines terming same as "fatally flawed" necessitating the auctions.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More

Multiples PE to invest at faster pace over next 2-yrs: CEO

Talking about the investment cycle in India, Multiples PE is basically a sector agnostic fund and looks at opportunities in each and every sector, says managing director and chief financial officer, Prakash Nene.

Multiples Alternate Asset Management Private Limited (Multiples) is an investment advisory firm that manages more than USD 400 million of Private Equity Funds. Multiples believes there are three ingredients to successful investing in India – careful selection based on conviction in the entrepreneur and opportunity; finding a solution beyond just providing capital; and mutual selection between the entrepreneur and the fund.

Multiples PE is now coming out with a second fund which is a 10-year fund with commitment amount of USD 650 million to be invested in 5-year time frame. However, they would be aggressively investing in the first two years on back of hopes that the Indian economy is now turning around, says Nene.

We are quite positive about the changes which are being made on the economic front. There are many incremental changes which are taking place and that is very heartening," adds Nene.

Althought the fund is sectors agnostic, spaces banking financial insurance (BFSI), e-commerce, healthcare will continue to be most attractive sectors, says Nene.

Below is the transcript of Prakash Nene's interview with CNBC-TV18's Kritika Saxena.

Q: Multiples PE since 2010 till date has been a roaring success if you compare it to the other domestic funds. You have raised USD 300 million funds which have been deployed already. How has the growth been given the fact that investing climate has been slightly slow ever since you setup. How have you been able to retain the investment pace and get the kind of success that you have gotten already?

A: We started in 2010 and the fund is slight bigger than what you thought because the dollar has depreciated otherwise we started with USD 400 million commitment. In terms of pace of investment we have been doing investment on a steady basis every year. We have a very strong investment team and lot of us came from another private equity venture and everybody is very experienced. So, we know the game and after all with all this whatever you do ultimately there has to be some external factors also which lead to success. So, we have to be very careful about where do you invest. In fact when you say our pace investment has been good, to begin with our pace of investment was very slow. We were very measured, our first investment took about a year to make.

Thereafter we really gathered pace because the team has to come together. Once the team came together that is how we started going forward at a faster pace.

Q: In your first fund what were your focus areas in terms of the average ticket size that you are looking at and the sectoral focus?

A: We are sector agnostic fund. We look at opportunity in each and every sector. In terms of verticals we look at certain percentage – 10-15 percent for early stage companies and rest of the companies are later stage companies. Our bias is towards later stage companies because our ticket size will be larger than early stage companies. So, USD 30 million would be our ticket size in the first fund. Obviously in the second fund it will be larger than that.

Q: Let us talk about your second fund; USD 500 million is the amount that you are looking at raising. What is the process and by when will you start deploying that? The fund amount is larger than what your other peer, which have seen average of USD 150-300 million, so what really according to you would be the focus areas and do you feel that now that this is a larger fund you would have a larger investment power to invest over the next couple of years?

A: First of all USD 500 million would be the main fund. We also have another vehicle. So, our total amount available for commitment will be USD 650 million. So, we would be deploying USD 650 million which is the target of this fund. We would be deploying that in just a matter of time now, we already have lot of commitments from our core investors. They are all coming back with larger tickets, so we have a number of documents already with us. We are just waiting to do a formal close.

Q: Typically, USD 650 million, roughly across how many year do you see that spanning out or rather the majority investment, would it be a 5 or 10 year timeframe?

A: Technically, the fund is a 10-year fund but what we call as commitment period, the commitment period would be about 5 years. So, 5 year is the timeframe where most of the investment will be made. However thereafter as well once you invest in a company there is a follow-on investment. The companies keep needing money from time to time and it is not that after 5 years company will not require any money. So, you set aside some amount 10-15 percent for follow-on investments beyond 5 years.

For the first 5 years normally we invest at a steady pace. It is not that you have to just divide by 5 and every year you invest USD 120 million. Our bias would be more towards the early years. So, the first couple of years we perhaps would be investing at a faster pace than the earlier year because we are quite positive that the economy is now turning around.

Q: Since 2010 till 2014 things were fairly difficult but the new government came in and we have seen things turn on ground. We have been talking about how the ease of doing business is now one of the top priorities for the government and how there is a pickup in the reform cycle. Do you feel that foreign investors are now looking at India differently and more positively in 2015 than they did in the last two years?

A: Absolutely. I would not say the last two years, I would say year before 2014, the pace of investment all of us know was very slow and things were pretty gloomy. However last year has been a decent year I would say. In the private equity sector I think about 400-450 deals have happened and the capital deployed is about USD 11 billion, which is a sizeable sum which was deployed. Exits have also improved now. Last year we had about USD 4-5 billion of exits and I think that pace will continue.

We are quite positive about the changes which are being made on the economic front. There are not too many what they call big bang changes, lot of people expect that suddenly things will be different and that doesn't happen but I would say there are many incremental changes which are taking place and that is very heartening. We believe that the government's policies are moving in the right direction. However once you change a policy there is some time lag once the economic activity picks up. So, on the ground the economic activity especially in manufacturing sector is yet to pickup, it is slowly picking up but certain other sectors things have started moving faster. So, we are looking very positively, the next two years that is the reason I said that perhaps the pace of investment which we are going to make in the next couple of years will be faster.

Q: Let us talk about taxation in that case; in the Budget this time around the government has created a big positive for the PE industry by allowing tax pass throughs. How significant is that for PE players and for Multiples PE?

A: I would say that pass through is one of the things which the domestic industry was looking forward to and which has now been granted. It is definitely positive for the industry. However what happens is that what you do at one place, you do something else in another place. What has been introduced in this Budget is something called Place of Effective Management (P.O.E.M). In the speech the Finance Minister has said that they are encouraging Indian fund managers like us to really manage foreign money without going abroad. Many of our colleagues have moved abroad simply from that angle.

Place of effective management is considered if you are based in India and if you are managing money in Mauritius or in other jurisdictions and those funds are called resident in India. If those funds are resident in India then they are not eligible for what is called treaty benefits. So, that is one clause – P.O.E.M has come.

Government has created what they call safe harbour rules. Safe harbour rules mean certain sectors of the economy and certain fund managers would be excluded. However what I find that most of those changes which have been made they are for FIIs – foreign institutional investors. Government has not looked very carefully as to what are the requirements of a fund manager who is not an FII but using FDI money.

FII is a regulated concept under Sebi but most of the funds especially private equity funds are not of that type. We typically will have 5-25 investors and not hundreds of investors. So, when you say that no single investor can have more than 10 percent in a company and all of us have an anchor investor which will be more than 10 percent. So, in that situation we will be excluded then you say 5 investors put together cannot own more than 10 percent and you cannot do a buyout.

Even in our first fund we own a company which is completely owned by us – 100 percent and buyout is a very important concept for a private equity. When a policy framework is made this is something which looks like inadvertently it has not been taken into account and I am quite hopeful that before the Budget is finally approved I think there will be some changes on this.


21.03 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger